Tag Archives: Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago

Twitter Censorship hits @IWPCHI and @FoWLChi

Twitter’s automated algorithm-based “quality control” system lays another egg.

Since 10 March 2018 our @IWPCHI Twitter account has been blocked by Twitter.  They claim that it is because our account has exhibited “automated behavior” – which is absolutely not true.  As anyone knows who has ever engaged us in conversation via our Twitter account, whenever we are online on Twitter we are “live” and have engaged commenters on our Tweets in sometimes quite extensive conversations.  There is simply no basis for their assertion that we have used some kind of automated program on Twitter.

Here is our latest reply to the Twitter machine:

Twitter’s censors seem to focus on excluding opponents of the US capitalist state. They seek to punish their customers for their own failure to effectively combat fake bot accounts which they have allowed to proliferate in the hundreds of millions on Twitter – thereby making their service seem far more popular than it is.

This censorship is also being experienced by our sister organization “Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago” who are also locked out of their account – for the third time – by the Twitter censorbots.

Twitter has built its Internet empire on fake accounts, which it has allowed to proliferate on its network since day 1; and recently, when the New York Times exposed the existence of perhaps hundreds of millions of fake Twitter accounts created by the “follower fraud” company “Devumi”, Twitter pretended to be “shocked, shocked!” that such things were going on in their little Internet Disneyland.

But, of course this is precisely how Twitter became the social media juggernaut it now is.

Now, to “rectify” their self-made crisis of confidence in their fraudulent follower base among their valued corporate customers, Twitter is seeking to “verify” the accounts of obviously legitimate customers by demanding that they divulge their phone numbers – or be locked out of Twitter forever.  For political activists, the prospect of having to reveal their identity to Twitter is tantamount to revealing it to the US government (which can obtain the information from Twitter simply by demanding it) and, potentially, to all those who oppose their activism in the event that Twitter – like far more “secure” organizations before them – gets hacked.  By forcing political activists living under repressive governments to divulge their personal phone numbers, Twitter is placing those people at risk of severe repercussions – including death – should those governments ever obtain Twitter’s database of personal customer information.  To say that the new Twitter policy of requiring every customer to provide a phone number is reckless is to make an extreme understatement of the issue.

Of course, Twitter is hiding the true reason for its new censorship campaign behind the absurd claim of the US capitalist class that their chosen candidate Hillary Clinton was soundly beaten in 2016 and Donald Trump elected President solely due to “Russian meddling” in social media – particularly Twitter.  They want us to believe that the flag-waving pro-US right-wing anticommunist (and in many cases outright US nativist fascist) supporters of Trump were all actually “Manchurian Candidate” voters under the spell of Vladimir Putin and a handful of pro-Putin trolls pushing Trump as the lesser evil candidate.  They expect us to believe that everyone who voted for Trump is a “traitor” in thrall to Putin!  What a load of crap!  And Twitter’s new campaign of rampant censorship is, we are supposed to believe, simply a reaction to this Russian “meddling” on Twitter. Twitter pretends that it can’t tell the difference between Russian bot Twitter accounts created in 2016 from legitimate Twitter accounts created long before Trump was even considering a run for the Presidency.  They can’t distinguish – they have no reliable method to tell the difference between Russian botnets and, say, the @IWPCHI or @FoWLChi accounts!  The “Russian bot crisis” – caused by Twitter’s own incompetence at monitoring its own network thus becomes an excuse for rampant censorship of their network.  Hillary Clinton was reported to have employed hundreds of thousands of fake Twitter accounts during the 2016 campaign… has she had her account locked out? No.  Donald Trump is a serial violator of the Twitter “Terms of Service”: has he had his Twitter account locked out?  No.  Only the accounts of working-class opponents of the Democratic Party – right and left – seem to be worthy of the automated Twitter censor’s hammer.  What a surprise!

This whole debacle only underscores how impossible it is to expect the capitalist class to create Internet services that provide a forum for democratic debate of issues of vital importance to the working class.  It is simply not in the class interests of the bourgeoisie to provide their wage-slaves opportunities to organize the overthrow of the capitalist system.  Twitter, like Google and Facebook, have rapidly evolved to become virtual extensions of the US government and its intelligence services’ data-mining operations.  That these quasi-governmental capitalist behemoths should engage in rampant censorship of working-class opponents of the capitalist system does not surprise us in the least.

—- IWPCHI

Advertisements

Huffington Post Writer’s Slander of WikiLeaks for “Publishing” Turkish AKP Members’ Personal Info Exposed

Today (July 27 2016) we were drawn into a controversy over whether or not WikiLeaks was responsible for the release of personal information of Turkish ruling class party AKP members to the world via Internet.

Zeynep Tufekci, a writer for Huffington Post and “Faculty associate, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University” – a US Department of State-funded organization – accused WikiLeaks of having iresponsibly “published” the personal information of every registered female voter in Turkey.  Our investigation of this charge proved – within just a few hours – that Tufecki’s cahrges were utterly baseless:  WikiLeaks had merly published a link to an enormous trove of hacked information from the AKP’s own files; they had never actually published the files in question.

Tufecki’s article provided a political cover for the attacks on WikiLeaks which immediately followed regarding their release of 23,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee that proved that the DNC actively sought to torpedo the candidacy of fake-socialist, real Democrat Bernie Sanders.

It turned out that Tufecki’s article – published before evidence proving that WikiLeaks had NOT been the original distributors of the AKP member docs was released – had erroneously accused WikiLeaks of “publishing” the AKP mambership list.  We challenged Tufecki’s assertions, and while we were engaged in that work, the man who actually released the AKP membership info contacted us to explain what had actually happened. Immediately upon receiving this new information we went to the Huffington Post website in an effort to correct the record in the comments to the slanderous article published by Tufecki.  We were unable to get our comment published on Huffington Post even after several attempts to post it.  While we were attempting to post this critique, Tufecki was simultaneously publishing a semi-retraction of her slander of WikiLeaks which actually RETAINED the principal slander that WikiLeaks “published” the AKP membership data (see new version: https://web.archive.org/web/20160728062731/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zeynep-tufekci/wikileaks-erdogan-emails_b_11158792.html  Compare w previous version: https://web.archive.org/web/20160726145245/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zeynep-tufekci/wikileaks-erdogan-emails_b_11158792.html ).

We are publishing our original comment to Huff Post which was apparently censored from their website this afternoon. (When we checked the comments thread for this article this morning – the next day – on Huff Post it was still not appearing on their site).  We will update this if necessary.

IWPCHI

***

IWPCHI’s original comment to article by Zeynep Tufekci censored by Huffington Post moderators: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zeynep-tufekci/wikileaks-erdogan-emails_b_11158792.html

WikiLeaks in fact did not post the AKP member information. That information was uploaded to the Internet Archive early on the morning of 21 July 2016 by Michael Best and then he Tweeted the link to it (@NatSecGeek on Twitter). He’s an “analyst and writer at http://GlomarDisclosure.com .” WikiLeaks, apparently trusting him as a source, saw his Tweet and reTweeted the link to their followers about five hours after Best first Tweeted it. Four days later (on July 25th), Zeynep Tufecki, a “Faculty associate, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University” – which is a US Department of State-supported outfit (see https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/about/support) published this article – without ever attempting to contact Best. In Tweets he sent to us today Best stated that “[Tufecki] didn’t contact me until I reached out… I’d’ve explained immediately if I had any idea what was going on. …but my name WAS on the page IDing me as the uploader… Plus my email address was in the metadata, and my Twitter has been open for DMs for exactly this reason.”
It should also be noted that no editor at the Huffington Post seems to have seen fit to have Tufecki contact Best before they published her article. Only once this HuffPo article appeared and it was brought to Mr. Best’s attention and he saw how WikiLeaks was being unfairly blamed for the release was he compelled to come forward on July 26 and reveal that it was he, not WikiLeaks, who uploaded the AKP membership info.
His article revealing himself as the original uploader is here: https://glomardisclosure.com/2016/07/26/the-who-and-how-of-the-akp-hack-dump-and-wikileaks-release/
So in a sense this whole affair appears to be something of a dark comedy of errors – except that the slander of WikiLeaks committed (inadvertently?) by Tufecki has been allowed to stand, and the damage to WikiLeaks’ reputation has been done and is extensive. Though HuffPo saw fit to append a note to the end of Tufecki’s article correcting the record to the effect that “WikiLeaks promoted links to the databases via its social media accounts but did not host those databases on its own site”, Tufecki’s article STILL asserts falsely (at the time we write this) “The leaked emails ***published by WikiLeaks*** were presented in a searchable database” [our emphasis]. This is slander, plain and simple.
Why do HuffPo and Tufecki continue to publish this damaging slander against WikiLeaks? It is well known that Huffington Post’s co-founded and editor-in-chief is a staunch supporter of the Obama Administration, which seeks to prosecute WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange – an Australian citizen – for exposing US Government crimes all over the world. Tufecki’s links to the US Dept. of State-supported “Berkman-Klein Center for Internet and Society” at Harvard (https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/zeynep) perhaps gives us another clue as to why her slander of WikiLeaks – if inadvertent – has not been rescinded.

While we do not support the WikiLeaks Party of Australia politically as it is a pro-capitalist political party, we do defend WikiLeaks; and we co-founded the “Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago” group to defend the free-speech rights of WikiLeaks, its founder Julian Assange and its members from all attacks launched against them by the US Government and its global auxiliaries. At no time have we received material support of any kind from WikiLeaks, the WikiLeaks Party or any of their leadership.

Independent Workers Party of Chicago
Find us on Twitter, WordPress and Facebook

(Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago is also on these social media outlets.)

 

Movie Review – CITIZENFOUR: “Speaking Truth to Power” is not What Needs to Be Done (* out of 5)

[Note: this review is being simultaneously published by the Independent Workers Party of Chicago and the Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago on the respective websites of both groups.]

CITIZENFOUR – a film by Laura Poitras  https://citizenfourfilm.com/

We expected a lot from Laura Poitras’ new film CITIZENFOUR; we were massively disappointed.  With ex- CIA/NSA contract worker Edward Snowden still stuck in exile in Russia and the citizenry of the United States far more interested in the latest shiny objects for sale at the Apple Store than in fighting for their rapidly disappearing Constitutional rights, we had hoped that this film would be a clarion call to the workers of the United States to take action in their own self-defense by standing up in support of Snowden and his fellow heroic whistle-blowers Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, Jeremy Hammond and others.  Instead what we get is a very tepid and shallow overview of “the story so far” of the world-shaking revelations made by Snowden exposing the US Government’s global espionage network that monitors and stores for future use every cellphone call, email message and the wealth of information derivable from our daily movements as recorded by our cellphones every day.  CITIZENFOUR should be like a nuclear howitzer blasting chunks out of the edifice of US and British imperialism; instead its effect is like that of a dozen pies thrown in the faces of a gang of war criminals.  You could say that CITIZENFOUR pulled all its punches… except for the fact that it never even attempts to throw any.  This is, by the way, the primary reason why it’s getting such great reviews from the bourgeois press.

So far as we can tell, the reason that Poitras doesn’t engage in aggressive political “agitprop” – a fact that nearly every reviewer from the bourgeois press extols as one of her film’s strengths – is apparently that she has no political axe to grind – or more accurately, she is a liberal bourgeois democratic reformist whose political aspirations rise no higher than to being one who “speaks truth to power”.  What this means in practice is that she and others like her – including Assange and Snowden – willingly self-limit the extent of their political activities to begging the “legitimate powers that be” to behave themselves and to urging the paid employees of the US capitalist ruling class that have set up the global espionage network – the bourgeois politicians in the “Five Eyes” nations – to start taking their alleged “responsibilities” to the citizens of their respective nations seriously by curbing the “excesses” that they themselves signed off on!

This kind of “inside the box” thinking may seem strange coming from the likes of Poitras, Assange, Snowden and Greenwald; but if we analyze their political philosophies in more detail it doesn’t seem strange at all.  Unless a person has consciously broken away from the worthless, selfish, greedy corporatist ideology of the capitalist system and has become a conscious Marxist revolutionary dedicated to the overthrow of the capitalist class and its economic system, one’s politics are going to be by definition REFORMIST at best; and so how can a non-revolutionary do anything else but simply beg the bourgeoisie to straighten up and fly right?  If you believe that the capitalist economic system is “the best of all possible economic systems”, and that only the capitalist class and its favored institutions of higher learning are capable of producing “legitimate” political leaders – where does that leave you politically?  It leaves you “speaking truth to power” like a good, loyal (if somewhat uppity) wage-slave!

Is CITIZENFOUR worth seeing?  For us, it was worth the price of admission just to see the “Dream Team” of Snowden, Greenwald and Poitras in the same room preparing to launch one of the world’s most impressive exposes of massive governmental abuses of power affecting everyone on the planet who has access to a telephone and/or a computer connected to the Internet.  This NSA spy scandal makes Watergate look like a pillow fight!  But the cursory overview made by the film of the extent of the revelations can’t be very compelling to anyone who hasn’t been following the story over the past year or so.  The movie barely describes the NSA and GCHQ-run “Five Eyes” espionage juggernaut; nor does it clearly show the threats of assassination and worse levied against Snowden, Assange and Greenwald by various US Government scumbags through the news media for daring to bring all this criminality into the light of day.  And, having not even really covered any of these issues, the film fails to even attempt to engage the audience in the critically important work of what is to be done: building new political parties to take down those that have erected the Big Brother spy apparatus that is intended to be used primarily to rapidly identify political opponents of the US, UK, Australian, Canadian and New Zealand Governments INSIDE  THEIR RESPECTIVE NATION-STATES!  This is, after all, the real purpose of all this espionage: to create a database of the day-to-day activities of every citizen of the world’s leading capitalist states in order to identify and neutralize them if they should ever seek to organize seriously threatening political opposition to the neo-fascist police states being set up in the US and its partners in the “Five Eyes” nations.  The primary target of all this espionage isn’t foreign terrorism: the target is the domestic working-class political opposition that – if it turns in a revolutionary socialist direction – potentially threatens the continued class rule of the capitalist classes of the world.  The capitalist classes of the US and UK in particular have absolutely no intention of sharing political power with the numerically and economically vastly superior working class that creates all the wealth under capitalism.  Any attempt by the domestic working classes of the US or UK to throw off the yoke of capitalist exploitation through political or economic strike action will immediately be placed under the microscope of the global espionage network, where the movement’s leaders will be quickly identified, isolated and “neutralized” – physically if the capitalists deem it to be necessary.  This is precisely what makes so extremely dangerous  the Obama Administration’s precedent-setting legal findings asserting that a sitting US President has the “right” to order the assassination of any US citizen whose writings or friends and associates he – or more accurately his employers in the US capitalist class – do not like.

This is not crazy commie paranoia speaking here: the Obama Administration has openly admitted that it has murdered four US citizens in drone strikes overseas – that we know of; and the US government maintains a “watch list” of its perceived opponents that already had a million people listed on it in 2009 – and it is being constantly updated. In 2013 it was reported that an additional 450,000 people were “nominated” to be added to the list – with few of the nominees escaping that dubious honor.

The faith in the hired political lackeys of the bourgeoisie implicitly espoused by Poitras, Greenwald, Snowden and Assange; their placid belief that steady pressure applied to the so-called liberal “left-wing” and Libertarian sections of the political class will ultimately win the day and allow the necessary political reforms to be enacted is, quite frankly, absurd – and evidence of a political immaturity in all of them that is quite shocking, especially considering what they have learned since Snowden came forward with his revelations.  Those actual members of the US or UK capitalist classes who go to see CITIZENFOUR will undoubtedly feel a tremendous relief in their discovery that these potentially dangerous opponents of the capitalist class are, in fact, posing no serious threat to the status quo at all.  The capitalists and their spies and hired guns can sleep a bit easier knowing that Poitras, Assange, Snowden and Greenwald – for all their genuine courage and excellent work in exposing the crimes of the ruling class – have set for themselves only the pathetic task of “speaking truth to power”.   That is something that the ruling class can listen to from Assange, Snowden – or anyone else, for that matter – for ever, condescendingly acknowledging and even thanking them profusely for their heroic selflessness in bringing to the world’s attention these “serious issues” – while doing absolutely nothing substantial to change the workings of the national security state at all.  Viewed in this way, CITIZENFOUR becomes just another pointless pantomime rebellion in the long, bloody history of capitalism.  The capitalists will, first of all, breathe a deep sigh of relief now that it’s clear that the film isn’t presenting an indictment of the capitalist class or their system; then, having been let largely off the hook by the film’s protagonists, we expect the capitalist class to continue to do what they have in fact been doing: applauding the film.   Perhaps Poitras and Greenwald will be invited to  testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee to speak “truth to power” on CSPAN; or at the Council on Foreign Relations… or at the United Nations or one of the capitalist soirees like the annual hand-wringing exercise at Davos, Switzerland.   Finally, perhaps, the capitalist class will direct the editors of their news media conglomerates to heap praise on the film and even to heartily recommend that it be awarded the Palme ‘d’Or, or even an Oscar or two!  This is how activist filmmakers like Poitras and investigative journalists like Greenwald are co-opted by the capitalist class and transformed from courageous opponents of the capitalist system to prominent pro-regime songbirds publicly displayed in golden cages. Ask Barbara Kopple or Bob Woodward how it’s done.

Poitras, Greenwald et al are, we believe, decent, courageous and apparently honest bourgeois reformist journalists.  But we ask our readers to imagine how much further along in investigating, exposing and successfully fighting this impending global police state we’d be if the documents unleashed by Snowden had been placed not in the hands of “responsible journalists” but in the hands of worker-revolutionaries who weren’t so loyally censoring the documents in order to “protect the agents and assets” of the racist, bloodthirsty and greed-obsessed US capitalist class and its spy organizations!  Snowden makes clear in the movie that his motivation for placing the blockbuster documents he purloined from the NSA into the hands of trustworthy representatives of the bourgeois press was that he wanted to be sure that there would be no reckless release of information that would seriously damage the “legitimate” goals of the shadow government of the US!  Greenwald et al have scrupulously respected the “sacred trust” placed in them by Snowden to protect the “family jewels” of the espionage agencies of US and British imperialism.  This is disgusting!  Instead of placing the interests of the 7.2 billion workers of the world above all else, Snowden and his team are protecting the “legitimate rights” of the microscopically small capitalist class against those of the multi-billion strong international working class!  Snowden and his collaborators are doing a tremendous service for the US and British capitalist classes, which are, by the way, going to repay them and all of us by imposing their will on the world – both internationally and domestically – through increasingly brutal military and police-state force.  To throw the US and British capitalist classes such a huge life-preserver when they should instead be having ANCHORS tied to their necks is to betray the entire human race in order to maintain the tenuous and despotic rule of a class of criminals responsible for the perpetuation of the horrors of a capitalist world in which – to name just one major example – the world does little or nothing while 17,000 children die of starvation every single day!  There is nothing “legitimate” about the capitalist class or their “interests”!  Every effort should be made to destroy the NSA, the CIA and the US military and the cretinous ruling class that spawned them – not to save them!

Nothing short of workers revolution can change the increasingly deranged plans of the US capitalist class.  They have plans of global military domination of the entire planet that go far beyond what even Adolf Hitler envisioned; so long as their political opponents refuse to form working class revolutionary parties to overthrow the capitalist class and system, the ruling capitalists have nothing to fear.

The working class, however, DOES have something to fear from the fact that most of their erstwhile leaders are so completely dedicated to the continuation of the brutal capitalist system that they are prepared to follow the capitalist class all the way down the road to hell, where the fascists and eventually World War Three will put an end to this historical epoch – and perhaps throw the human race back into a pre-industrial stage of development.  Apparently, these folks think that they have more to gain from clinging to the coat-tails of the capitalist class than they can gain by fighting for the emancipation of the workers of the world.  If they insist on taking the capitalist road, that’s fine; but let’s not imagine that because THEY are heading down that road, that we, too, must take that well-worn path to political oblivion.  We’re not followers – we aspire to be revolutionary workers leaders. We warn the Poitrases and Greenwalds of the world of the dangers that lie ahead; we try to point out the reasons why we disagree with them; we urge them to take the high rather than the low road; but we can’t force them to lead a workers revolution.  They are simply not revolutionaries; perhaps it’s just not in their nature to be revolutionaries.  It’s a pity, but that is, in the end, their problem – we don’t need to make it ours.

The working class must look elsewhere than to Poitras, Snowden, Assange and Greenwald for the political leadership necessary to lead the workers of the world out of the dead end of the capitalist stage of development and into the next stage: that of socialism.  It’s “socialism or barbarism” brothers and sisters, just like Marx, Engels, Lenin, Luxemburg, and Trotsky explained to us so many years ago!  Now –  as then – to ignore the warnings of those great, selfless and honest internationalist leaders of the working class is to help the capitalist class pave the road leading to the hell of the next – and possibly this time, the last – world war.

Workers of the World, Unite!

IWPCHI and Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago

350.org: “Rockefeller Brothers Fund”-Created Phony Environmentalist Organization Tricks Workers Into Participating In Fake Environmental Activism

How the capitalist class creates a fake "movement" that pretends to fight the environmental destruction caused by the capitalist system they run.  Rockefeller Brothers Fund's 350.org

How the capitalist class creates a fake “movement” that pretends to fight the environmental destruction caused by the capitalist system they run:  The Rockefeller Brothers Fund’s 350.org

The capitalist world is composed of frauds designed to rob the working class and keep the workers blind to the fact that they are being exploited 24/7/365, from the time they wake up in the morning until they go to sleep at night.

Most of these frauds are easy to spot, like the Obamacare swindle, which is nothing but a giant gift to Wall St. Puppet-in-Chief Barack Obama’s patrons running the US insurance, pharmaceutical and health care conglomerates.

Others are not so easy to detect right away because they hide their true sponsors behind several layers of bullshit knowing that only those who know how these things work – revolutionary Trotskyists like us – will tear the wrapping off the package until we get to its creamy shit center.   Which we do – and then we show it to the world for all to enjoy. Or for the world to ignore, which is more usually the case, especially in dumber-than-dogshit USA.

Our pals over at Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago have  already exposed the Tor Project – that fake-secure onion-router network operation  run from Day One by the Pentagon  and  financed to this day by the US Department of Defense,   which the Executive Director of the Tor Project Andrew Lewman admitted to FoWL Chicago  and defended in a pair of emails he sent to them, which they published in January 2013.   Lewman lied and said that Tor doesn’t hide the fact that it’s sponsored by the US Defense Department and Department of State, but in the year since the issue was raised with him, Tor has buried the source of their funding deeper into the fake NGO SRI International, which actually acts as a cut-out for the US Defense Department:

Using SRI International as a cover for "pass-through" funding from Pentagon allows Tor project to claim they aren't funded by Pentagon.  Unfortunately, the IRS requires them to disclose the true source of funds in their annual financials.

Using SRI International as a cover for “pass-through” funding from Pentagon allows Tor project to claim they aren’t funded by Pentagon. Unfortunately, the IRS requires them to disclose the true source of funds in their annual financials.  And USAID isn’t much of a cover either.

Well, we all know by now that Tor is a piece of shit and, as Andrew Lewman helpfully told FoWL Chicago, Tor should not be trusted by anyone being targeted by a nation-state… which means that since the US Government is spying on every purposeful Internet communication on the planet, we’re all fucked if we use Tor.

Which sort of allows us to make an awkward segue to our latest discovery of capitalist-class-sponsored fraud: the very impressive NGO 350.org   We ran across these scoundrels today while we were slapping the crap out of the US’ pro-capitalist trade-union misleadership who are busily pimping off thousands of young, bright-eyed and stupid trade unionists to the Democrats for yet another round of self-defeating “get-out-the-vote” campaigns for that warmongering, racist-cop-loving, pro-big-business anti-worker party. (The Democrats are even taking campaign donations from Wal-Mart this election cycle –  but don’t tell the dummies working the AFL-CIO’s phone banks on behalf of the Democrats, they think that the Dems are the “party of labor”!)

Among the groups we follow on Twitter are many activists working on the demonstrations against the police murder of Mike Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.  Reading a conversation with one of them we saw this:

Shameless Rockefeller scum exploit Pacific Islanders' naivete to produce "grassroots" impotent gesture organization dedicated to making it look like something is being done to defend the planet from environmental destruction.

Shameless Rockefeller scum exploit Pacific Islanders’ naivete to produce “grassroots” impotent gesture organization dedicated to making it look like something is being done to defend the planet from environmental destruction caused by the capitalist system run by the Rockefellers… oh my we just made ourselves dizzy! Did you feel it too?

Initially we thought that these folks were part of the new political party in New Zealand led by Maori activists and Kim Dotcom.  But we were mistaken.  We looked closer, as is the practice of Marxists:

Is there no depth of depravity to which the US capitalist class will not go in order to continue to rape the planet from pole to pole?

Is there no depth of depravity to which the US capitalist class will not go in order to continue to rape the planet from pole to pole?

This looked semi-authentic so far… but look closer.  Professional logo; sophisticated advertising techniques in photo and logo design… the whole thing is designed to get liberal youth to squeal with joy at finding an authentic, exotic ethnic “cause” that they can support with all the power of their tiny little hearts & minds between trips to the mall.    And then we saw the 350.org  web address.  OK, lets zoom in for a closer look:

The 350.org homepage, 15 October 2014. "We"'re building a global climate movement?  Who is this "we" you speak of, 350.org?

The 350.org homepage, 15 October 2014. “We”‘re building a global climate movement? Who is this “we” you speak of, 350.org? “Led from the bottom up”?  Really?  Let’s see.

Well now this is starting to look like a lot of bogus front groups we’ve been seeing lately, like the DreamDefenders – a Democratic Party front group. We thought that only the commies did this kind of crap!

“OK so where do we start the search for the scumbags behind 350.org?”  That is really what we were thinking at this point, no shit!  We already KNEW that this was a bogus, pro-capitalist pressure organization, probably run by the Democratic Party.  But where to find the proof?  Well usually if you click on the link that says “About us” or… oh there it is… upper left-hand corner… “ABOUT”…

Ahh, here we are... we're getting somewhere now.  The "Staff" page on "DreamDefenders was just a bunch of names of activists... what about this "Board of Directors" thing...?

Ahh, here we are… we’re getting somewhere now. The “Staff” page on “DreamDefenders” was just a bunch of names of activists… what about this “Board of Directors” thing…?

So we clicked on the “Board of Directors” link and…

LOL Bill McKibben - a useful idiot for whoever is really running this thing! These people are all fronts for the criminals behind this obvious fraud!  It's like a set of those nested Russian dolls... we can smell shit now! Where to look next?  What's this?  US Advisory Board...? Be careful where you step!

LOL Bill McKibben – a useful idiot for whoever is really running this thing! These people are all fronts for the criminals behind this obvious fraud! It’s like a set of those nested Russian dolls… we can smell shit now! Where to look next? What’s this? US Advisory Council…? Click on it… but be careful where you put your mouse!

BINGO!  WE KNEW IT!  THESE FUCKING SCUM!  Using those Pacific Islanders for this deeply cynical scam!

Van Jones – Democratic party hack; Gus Speth – UN Development Programme, Yale University; Natural Resources Defense Council… and… what’s this?  “Rockefeller Brothers Fund”?

Scroll down some more…

Here we are! The center of this shit sandwich!  The Rockefeller Brothers Fund!  350.org is financed by that well-known family of arch-environmentalists - the ROCKEFELLERS!  ROFL!  What a disgusting scam!

Here we are! The center of this shit sandwich! The Rockefeller Brothers Fund! 350.org is financed by that well-known family of arch-environmentalists – the ROCKEFELLERS! ROFL! What a disgusting scam!  Hendricks is just another dime-a-dozen Democratic Party hack.  These Rockefeller “environmentalists” are responsible for a large portion of the greenhouse gases produced from the time of the inception of  the Industrial Revolution to the present day!

Well, that gives us just one or two more links to click on; first: the “Rockefeller Brothers Fund”… it’s got to be the same Rockefellers, right…?

Yep!  It's the same Rockefeller family all right... heirs of the hideous oil trust octopus John D. Rockefeller unleashed on the planet in the late 1800s - the infamous Standard Oil Trust.

Yep! It’s the same Rockefeller family all right… heirs of the hideous oil trust octopus John D. Rockefeller unleashed on the planet in the late 1800s – the infamous Standard Oil Trust!

This is absolutely repulsive… that these vicious pigs would use those doomed Pacific Islanders – doomed thanks to the global warming that is melting the polar icecaps and that will soon put all their islands under water… a phenomenon largely attributable to the burning of fossil fuels by the oil and steel companies, railroads and chemical producers owned or controlled by this family… as a front for this monstrous fraud!

Proof that there is no God: the Rockefeller family.

Proof that there is no God: the Rockefeller crime family.

So the lesson for today, children is: beware of capitalists bearing gifts of any kind; and always look behind the front man or woman to see where the money is coming from.  If it isn’t coming directly from the working class then it isn’t a “grassroots organization”.   There are many ways that the capitalist class can use you to further their criminal agendas: don’t fall for this crap!

350.org-2013-audit

Independent Petroleum Association of America article referencing 350.org’s ties to Rockefellers

Fellow wage and debt slaves: nothing less than a bona fide party of the working class should be acceptable to you; a political party funded entirely by dues and donations from the working class, not from capitalist enterprises or the Democratic or Republican party’s front men and women.  EVERY POLITICAL ACTIVIST ORGANIZATION THAT IS NOT FUNDED ENTIRELY BY THE WORKING CLASS IS TIED TO AND RUN BY THE CAPITALIST CLASS IN SOME WAY!  There are dozens of these political fraud organizations out there all over the world!  Accept no substitutes for a revolutionary socialist workers party that has as its principal goal the overthrow of the capitalist system worldwide and its replacement with an egalitarian federation of socialist workers republics!

Workers of the World, Unite!  JOIN US!

Independent Workers Party of Chicago

Did John McCain Meet with ISIS in 2013? Rapid Evolution of Syrian Civil War Leads to Shifting Allegiances, New Names for Old Poisons

We’ve been fascinated – as have been many others –  by the reports alleging that John McCain actually met with ISIS militants back in May of 2013 when he made a “secret” trip to Syria. We find these reports to be credible; to the best of our knowledge they have never been effectively debunked.  And on top of that we know from previous incidents that John McCain – wittingly or unwittingly – has allowed himself to be photographed in the company of some very unsavory characters in the recent past,  like his tete a tete with Ukrainian fascist Oleh Tyahnybok of the Svoboda Party. The photos of McCain in Syria have been alleged to have shown him consorting with men who were either members of the ISIS/ISIL group at the time the photos were taken, or who joined ISIS/ISIL later on in 2013 or 2014. Here are some of the photos:

(1) McCain meeting with alleged "ISIS" members in Syria - May 2013

(1) McCain meeting with alleged “ISIS” members in Syria – May 2013

(2) McCain meeting with alleged "ISIS" members in Syria - May 2013

(2) McCain meeting with alleged “ISIS” members in Syria (Free Syrian Army General Salim Idris is man in striped shirt) – May 2013

3 - McCain_ISIS_Mtg_May_2013_Johnny_2

3 – McCain_ISIS_Mtg_May_2013_Johnny_2

Now, we know the identity of one of these people: the man in the striped shirt with the glasses and small moustache is “General” Salim Idris, formerly of the preferred US puppet “rebel” force in Syria, the “Free Syrian Army”.  The question is not about who the people in the photo WERE in May of 2013 but who they ARE today.  It is alleged that the man on the left in the photo above is (today) none other than Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – the head honcho in ISIS/ISIL.  The man standing to the far left in photo #2 is alleged to be  Khalid al-Hamad, identified as the “heart eater” from an infamous ISIS/ISIL video:

Khalid al-Hamad, alleged ISIS heart-eater

Khalid al-Hamad, alleged ISIS heart-eater

General Idris, who was apparently an actual “General” in the Syrian military until a couple of years ago, is not what is knows as a “fighting general”; in fact,  he is better known as a “running General”; yet that didn’t stop the US Government and John McCain from installing him as their puppet leader of the US/NATO puppet “Free Syrian Army”. At any rate, no one denies that McCain went to Syria in May 2013 to meet with “Syrian moderates” fighting the Assad regime.  What is in dispute is the political/military affiliation of the men sitting around the table chatting with John McCain. When  woman-hating right-wing Republican/Libertarian blowhard Rand Paul  took fellow Republican McCain to task for posing for photos with ISIS, he was roundly lambasted for his foolishness by (mostly) pro-Democratic party “journalists”.   The New York Times even ridiculed everyone dumb enough to fall for the “obvious” fraud.  The Washington Post weighed weighed in, heavily, with an attack piece on Rand Paul’s adherence to the “fraud” of McCain’s alleged meeting with ISIS militants.  The WaPo’s clumsy hatchet man, Glenn Kessler, even had the temerity to drop this bon mot:  “Last time we checked, the Times is still a more credible source than Weasel Zippers.” Seems the folks down there at both the Washington Post and at America’s “Newspaper of Record” have long ago managed to choke down the last of their heaping helping of humble pie dished out to them by a certain Judith Miller. The problem is that none of the august bourgeois press outlets so much as bothered to actually refute the sources of the story of McCain’s meeting with ISIS.  Instead, in the case of Washington Post, they attacked the credibility of the small-time online journalists and alternative news outlets, rather than providing an actual rebuttal of the McCain/ISIS meeting.  “A variety of Web sites began to claim that Islamic State posted photographs of McCain posing with its members, news sources of dubious value called Weasel Zippers, Counter Current News, Atlas Shrugged and Socio-Economics History Blog. Usually, the accounts provided limited or no sourcing, just photographs of McCain with alleged Islamic State members circled. Socio-Economics, which says it presents news in a satirical way, also suggests that the head of the Islamic State is a Mossad agent and has two Jewish parents” quoth the Post.  See how that’s done, future “Reputable Journalists of America”?  You don’t need to rebut the content of the allegations so long as they come from a news organization that doesn’t have the “access” to “unnamed sources” in the top levels of the government like Judith Miller had.  Nowhere in the Post article does the author-assassin bother to actually assess the claims made in any of these various news organizations’ stories about the McCain/ISIS meeting. The New York Times takes a similar tack.  In their article “rebutting” the claims of a McCain/ISIS meeting, they even go so far as to edit the photo of McCain the alleged ISIS members in order to remove from view the alleged “heart-eater” Khalid al-Hamad.  Compare this photo with photos 1 and 2 above:

NY Times edited photo removes alleged 'heart-eater'

NY Times edited photo removes alleged ‘heart-eater

The photo of the man circled in red is supposed by everyone who claims that McCain met with ISIS to be ISIS top man al-Baghdadi.  How does the new York Times refute this claim?  “The rumors are based partly on images of a Syrian fighter who resembles Mr. Baghdadi, seen in photographs with Mr. McCain — some originally posted on Twitter by the senator — during his visit in May 2013 to northern Syria […]  Nurtured by conspiracy blogposts, social media and photo-altering tricks, the false rumors of Mr. McCain’s relationship with ISIS have taken on a life of their own. One doctored photo shows the senator, an Arizona Republican, pinning a medal on Mr. Baghdadi’s chest.”

Not only does the New York Times not bother to show the “doctored” photo of McCain pinning a medal on “Baghdadi”‘s chest; it doesn’t mention the fact that the photo it does provide is itself doctored to remove another man alleged to be a member of ISIS.

Our friends at “Friends of WikiLeaks – Chicago” had a series of interesting Tweets with a man who goes by the name of @soccerMouaz who turns out to be the same based-out-of-Washington D.C. pro-US-invasion-of-Syria cretin widely quoted by both the Times and the Post: one Mouaz Moustafa.  He ridiculed FoWL Chicago for falling for the fraudulent claim that McCain met ISIS at this meeting pictured above.  Yet, when FoWL Chicago challenged Moustafa to identify the men in the photo in order to put the matter to rest – he declined. Here are a couple of highlights of the FoWL Chicago/ Mouaz Moustafa joust:

Mouaz Moustafa, Executive Director of "Syrian Emergency Task Force" - Twitter Bio

Mouaz Moustafa, Executive Director of “Syrian Emergency Task Force” – Twitter Bio

1 - Mouaz Moustafa vs FoWL 2oct2014

1 – Mouaz Moustafa vs FoWL 2oct2014

FoWL Chicago vs Mouaz Moustafa 2 - 2oct2014

FoWL Chicago vs Mouaz Moustafa 2 – 2oct2014

In the Times article above, we read this: “Mouaz Moustafa, the executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a Washington-based group that helped to arrange the senator’s visit, said all of the people who appeared in those photographs were at risk. When ISIS published the first issue of its magazine, Mr. Moustafa said, it featured one of the photographs and proclaimed, ‘We have to cut all these people’s heads off.’ ”  Okay… so where is THAT photo?  Where is the screenshot of the ISIS website where that appeared?  We have not found it anywhere.  Everywhere we look, we see the “reputable press” doing its best to ridicule a story without providing a shred of proof that the story is based on falsehoods.  The Times again: “Brian Rogers, Mr. McCain’s communications director, was not amused. The man who was misidentified as Mr. Baghdadi in the photographs, Mr. Rogers said Thursday, was a commander of the Northern Storm Brigade, a group linked to the Free Syrian Army. Mr. Rogers declined to identify him by name, saying he feared for the man’s safety.” “Feared for the man’s safety”?  He’s in a WAR ZONE!  His photo has been splashed all over the Internet already!  We are not asking for the geographical coordinates of his home, we’re only asking who he is!  Can’t anyone provide a profile of the man?  An interview with proof that while he was in Syria with the FSA, al-Baghdadi was somewhere else?  The total refusal by the members of the loyal, pro-US, pro-war bourgeois press to provide any documentary evidence seems calculated to instill rather than to dispel the doubts of those prone to adhere to conspiracy theories.  And, as we mentioned above, given McCain’s known penchant for being photographed in the company of people most US citizens would not allow to darken their doorsteps – like the Ukrainian Nazis – the refusal of the Times or the Post to go the extra distance to prove their arguments seems odd indeed. As if this all wasn’t weird enough, as we started to work on this piece we read this op-ed in the Times!:   How America Helped ISIS Now we really are confused! What seems to us to lay at the heart of the confusion is a phenomenon known to exist in the capitalist world – an utter inability to see the totality of events due to the myopic worldview of the capitalist class.  Marxists like us see the world as an ever changing kaleidoscope of events, each one melding and evolving into the next in an evolutionary fashion.  People who live “inside the box” of the capitalist worldview see only the trees, not the forest; and they see the forest as a eternal reality, not as something that is being born and dying at the same time. In the present case, they can’t seem to understand that although McCain may not have actually intended to meet with ISIS militants, that may in fact have been precisely what he did, because in a fast-moving environment of the type taking place in Syria, yesterday’s “Free Syrian Army” transforms itself into today’s ISIS. ISIS is, after all, (according to the Times itself) merely a recently “rebranded” “Al Qaeda in Iraq”: “In June 2010, Stratfor published a report on the group that considered its prospects in the wake of the killings of the top leadership. The report stated, ‘the militant organization’s future for success looks bleak.’ “Still, the report said, referring to the Islamic State of Iraq, then an alternative name for Al Qaeda in Iraq, ‘I.S.I.’s intent to establish an Islamic caliphate in Iraq has not diminished.'” And even today, the New York Times itself maintains relics of the “old names” for ISIS on its website, switching back and forth between the too-unwieldy “Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia” and “ISIS”:

NY Times, 2oct2014: First it's "Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia" (see link name at bottom of photo as mouse hovers over link in article)

NY Times, 2oct2014: First it’s “Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia” (see link name at bottom of photo as mouse hovers over link in article)…

But when you click on the link, magically…

NYTimes 2oct14 now its 'ISIS'

NYTimes 2oct14 – Now its ‘ISIS’ (see web address at top)

So it seems that with all the change going on in these organizations over the course of a year of civil war, no one really knows just who is who after all. Last year’s “Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia” is this year’s “ISIS”.  “Old poison, new bottle” as our friends at FoWL Chicago put it.   So perhaps all these “non-denial denials” emanating from the Times, the Post and from all other “reputable” news media organizations (you could call them “pro-US imperialist propaganda sheets”; a rose by any other name being… you know) are just desperate attempts to stay “on message” as the US capitalist class and its bought-and-paid-for politicians and “knights of the pen” bang the drums for yet another war. In May of 2013, no one heard of ISIS; the main enemy was still “Al Qaeda”.  Fast-forward 12 months or so and “Al Qaeda” can’t get hardly any press no more!  It’s all “ISIS, ISIS, ISIS!”  Who IS doing the PR for ISIS?  They’re damned good, aren’t they? Until we see some proof that al-Baghdadi was definitely NOT in the room with McCain in that photo, and that the ISIS “heart-eater” was NOT the guy in the pics outside the meeting room, we will lean towards believing that once again, that old warmonger “Jihad John” McCain fucked up. US/UN/NATO HANDS OFF SYRIA! Workers of the World, Unite! IWPCHI

WikiLeaks Party of Australia’s “Transparency” Problem: Not-So-Openly Preferring Fascists Over Working-Class Parties

It’s one thing to criticize governments from an ivory tower; it’s quite another thing to take an essentially reformist whistleblowing organization and to turn it into a viable political party.   Occupy Wall St. never had the cojones or the intention to even try to create a political party, perhaps because its leaders knew what an impossible task it would be to attempt to weld a mishmash of disaffected political activists and declassed petit-bourgeois holding diametrically opposed political opinions into a cohesive political party.  So they never bothered to try, and fell on their own wooden swords – “rugged individualists”, all.

WikiLeaks is trying to assault the windmill of supra-class politics by creating the “WikiLeaks Party of Australia”.  It’s essentially an attempt to spring Julian Assange from his gilded cage in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London by getting him elected to the Australian Senate, by which maneuver he will obtain (allegedly) diplomatic immunity of sorts.  It’s not a bad idea providing that there is enough advanced political consciousness behind the noble – but extremely limited – reformist experiment of WikiLeaks.  But, like most wishful thinking, this, too, has proven to be of no more substance than a wad of cotton candy.

The historical landscape  is littered with the bones of long-dead but once high-flying reformist political parties that tried to base themselves on something besides the class struggle politics of the Marxist/Leninist communist movement.  Idealistic reformists all across the globe who harbored deep hatred for the “communism” of the Stalinist USSR and its satellites sought repeatedly to create allegedly pro-working class anti-communist parties from scratch.  Their success rate to date has been nil.  They all wind up revealing their utter contempt for the working class, selling out strikes and, ultimately,  throwing down with their “own” bourgeoisie and its imperialist state against revolutionary movements led by socialists or “communists”.

In Australia, as in Italy, their bourgeois democratic parliamentary system has produced  hundreds of ridiculous self-aggrandizing single-issue “political parties” – none of which have any intention at all of ever taking power into their own callus-free little hands and building a new society.  Most of these parties have some degree of hostility to Marxist ideology which causes them to distance themselves from the trade union and socialist movements of the working class.  In fact, these petty political parties seem to want to pretend that the working class – numerically by far the largest section of the population in ANY modern nation-state – doesn’t even exist!  Many – if not most – of their their party programs make no mention of support for the workers movement or for trade unions or for the working class at all.  This is not an accident: it is due to the fact that the leaders of all these ridiculous and essentially phony “political parties” are run by small businessmen (petit-bourgeois) whose own personal wealth is based on the exploitation of workers, and whose hostility towards the organized working class arises directly from their class status as petit-bourgeois.  The leadership of these parties are, by their very nature, incapable of overthrowing the existing economic and political order of things under capitalism.  In fact, the only problem that the petit-bourgeois have against capitalism is that they themselves don’t own enough capital.  Thus they find themselves – and their political party programs – utterly at odds with the class interests of the vast majority of their fellow citizens – the working class – from whom they and the big capitalists extract profits, enriching themselves and simultaneously impoverishing the workers.

Some of these petit-bourgeois would-be political “leaders” are conscious of the fact that their politics are in opposition to those of the working class.  We imagine that most of these conscious opponents of the working class among the petit-bourgeoisie BECAME conscious of their opposition thanks to a Marxist friend or friends, or due to the teachings of a professor or two they ran across at university, who turned them on to the basics of Marxism way back when they were young and “idealistic”.

Others do not fit into this category.  These unfortunate souls do not possess even a smattering of understanding of the fundamental class divisions of capitalist society (as elucidated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels way back in 1848 in “The Communist Manifesto”).  This vast ignorance of the basic political and social realities of the societies that these pathetically under-educated petit-bourgeois LIVE IN leaves them grasping at straws when they try, desperately, to defend their extremely tenuous position as small businessmen against the massive political and economic forces arrayed against them by the big capitalists.   In a desperate attempt to appeal to the “better side” of the big capitalists, these pathetic petit-bourgeois parrot all the anticommunist and anti-working-class drivel they’ve been taught from the day they learned to watch T.V., spewing it back out in the form of their pathetic, reactionary “party programs”.  The most foolish of them attempt to create political parties without making any attempt to make even the most cursory appeal to the brutally exploited masses of workers who work for them, live all around them and without whom the petit-bourgeois themselves wouldn’t even be able to exist!

This is precisely what Julian Assange and the WikiLeaks Party of Australia are trying to do.  They have produced a party platform that doesn’t even MENTION the working class ONCE in the 15 pages of its party program!  Only ONCE does this “party program” even MENTION the word “union” – and then it is referring to the “European Union”!  Not even ONCE does it mention the concept of WOMEN’S RIGHTS!  Hell, you can’t even find the words “woman” or “women” in it at all!  It adopts essentially the same attitude towards immigrants as the current and previous Australian governments, asserting only that the detention of immigrants be “capped” at 45 days for “health and security” reasons, leving it up to the tender mercies of the Australian judicial system to decide if it would be O.K. to extend that detention period.  In short, the WikiLeaks Party of Australia has produced a party program that is not worth a cup of spit in so far as any woman, worker or immigrant is concerned!  BUT THEY WANT AND EXPECT TO OBTAIN THE WORKERS’ VOTES!  AND THEY WANT THE WORKING CLASS TO FINANCE THE WIKILEAKS PARTY, TOO!

As if this isn’t insulting enough and absurd enough to the worker-citizens of Australia and the entire world, the WikiLeaks Party wants to go the extra distance in order to prove their allegiance to the class interests of the top 10% of filthy rich Australians by showing that the WLPA are not a  threat to Australian capitalism!

How do they do this?  By secretly submitting to the Australian Electoral Committee  this list of their “preferred” political parties – parties to whom the WikiLeaks Party of Australia could hand over their votes in the event that the WikiLeaks Party of Australia does not win the 2013 Australian Senate election.

As many Australians were shocked to find out, and as you can see from the link above, the WikiLeaks Party of Australia has “preferred” several far-right parties and even at least one actual fascist party – the “Australia First Party” – over a number of socialist workers parties!

As if they had not made their political program clear enough by doing this, recently Julian Assange, WLPA candidate for Senate, in an online press conference, stated that he was a “big admirer” of U.S. Senators Ron and Rand Paul – both of whom are considered to be among the most right-wing conservative of all U.S. members of Congress!  Both Ron and Rand Paul are famous for their opposition to abortion even in case of rape or incest; and Ron Paul is infamous for having – for years – published newsletters spouting disgusting racist and anti-Semitic propaganda!

The WikiLeaks party of Australia has claimed that the favoritism shown by them in their “preference statement” was due merely to an “administrative error”.  But we warn the working class of Australia that the deep political CONSISTENCY of these actions shines a harsh light on the politics of the WikiLeaks Party of Australia.  Among the leaders of this party are obviously some people who are extremely hostile to the rights of women, minorities and the workers movement.  This comes as no surprise to Marxists like us, as we know from over 150 years of worldwide historical experience that the fascists recruit their leaders precisely from that petit-bourgeois strata of the population from which has emerged Julian Assange and the leadership of the WikiLeaks Party.  We are not asserting that the WikiLeaks Party of Australia is a fascist or neo-fascist party: it is not.  They are in fact running a man of Indian ancestry as one of their candidates.   But they have openly allied themselves with people who are themselves closely aligned with some well-known extreme right-wing elements of both the Australian and U.S. political scenes.  This is not an “administrative error”!  It is a conscious attempt by the WikiLeaks Party of Australia to present to the capitalist class of Australia their “pledge of allegiance” to the capitalist system, and their distaste for any political movement of the working class.

[The “Friends of WikiLeaks -Chicago” group – which we are very closely allied to – has written an email to the WikiLeaks Party of Australia asking for immediate clarification of these “administrative errors”.]

It is because of this that we warn the working class of Australia: DO NOT VOTE FOR THE WIKILEAKS PARTY OF AUSTRALIA!  They offer you, the workers of Australia, absolutely NOTHING in return for your vote.  Their political program is a work in progress, and so far it doesn’t look good at all.  They are a pro-capitalist political party, and have no intention of ever doing anything to disrupt the capitalist economy of Australia.  In the words of Julian Assange: “Wikileaks Party is a party of accountability, it’s not a party of government… It’s a party to put into the Senate, to make sure whoever is put into the government does their job. It’s an insurance against the election.”

[Source: The Indian Down Under,  “Suresh Rajan is a candidate from Western Australia for WikiLeaks Party”, 5 August, 2013 ]

In other words, they are a classic reformist outfit that will restrict themselves to holding the feet of the Australian capitalist class’ political puppets “to the fire” – nothing more.   They are so boundlessly ignorant of the basic political and social realities of capitalist society that they simply do not deserve the support of any politically conscious worker.

We hope to have the time to provide a comprehensive critique of the WikiLeaks Party of Australia’s latest incarnation of its political program in the next week or so.

IWPCHI