This past week I’ve finally started to plow through the 3234 emails of US National Institutes of of Allergy and Infectious Diseases chief Dr. Anthony Fauci, released to the public through a Freedom of Information Act request earlier this year; and although I’ve not quite gone through even a third of them, I’ve already found several that contain very interesting material regarding what Dr. Fauci knew about the likely severity of illness the public could expect from the COVID-19 virus and when he knew it.
One of the primary mysteries to those of us who have been skeptical about the actual threat posed to the public by the “#DeadlyVirus(TM)” SARS-CoV-2, more commonly known as the COVID-19 virus, is why public health officials seemed to become more and more hysterical over the alleged threat from the virus as more scientific data came in which indicated that the threat from the virus was negligible at best and posed no “existential threat” to the human race, as the bourgeois press, politicians and others would have the world believe. What kept the scientists like Dr. Fauci from actually “following the science” and from keeping public health officials, politicians and the public accurately informed of the *lessening threat* from COVID-19 that was being revealed to us almost daily as the latest scientific data came to light?
Several emails I’ve seen indicate that as early as February 2020 Dr. Fauci was telling his correspondents that, though it was too early to tell for certain at that time, there was a distinct possibility that COVID-19 pandemic might turn out to be more akin to the very severe 1957 or 1968 flu pandemics rather than the truly disastrous 1918-19 flu pandemic that killed between 50-150 million people worldwide. Somehow, this message was never relayed to the public at all; it was buried beneath a mountain of hysterical reportage of what the bourgeois press dubbed a “deadly virus” long before there were even 50 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the entire world. The failure of the top scientists in the US to emphasize to the press the very likely probability that the COVID-19 pandemic would not be as deadly as the 1918 pandemic led to hysterical news reporting that panicked the politicians and public health officials of the USA; and that panic was then transferred to public health officials, politicians and people across the globe who have long been accustomed to look to the US government – and particularly top US government scientists and public health experts – for leadership in how to respond to a crisis of this nature. When the US government appeared to panic, the stage was set for one of the worst public health policy disasters in human history. The Fauci emails reveal some clues as to how this global disaster got a big push from top US government public health officials.
An example: On 16 February 2020, CBS News Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Jonathan LaPook sent Dr. Fauci an email in an attempt to check the veracity of an alarming email LaPook had received from a correspondent who works on Wall St.; it’s a two-part email, reproduced here with my notes added:
Part 1 of 16 February 2020 email from CBS News Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Jonathan LaPook to Dr. Anthony Fauci of NIAID, with Fauci’s reply. Comments in red by IWPCHI.
Part 2 of 16 February 2020 email from CBS News Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Jonathan LaPook, to Dr. Anthony Fauci of NIAID. Comments in red by IWPCHI.
The email indicates that, in mid-February 2020, Dr. Fauci – one of the best-informed scientists on Earth in regards to the latest developments in the evolving scientific understanding of the actual threat posed by COVID-19 – was of the opinion that not only was it unlikely that COVID-19 posed some kind of existential threat to the human race, it was entirely possible that it would not come anywhere near the level of deadliness of the 1918 flu pandemic; and he envisioned a possibility that it would turn out to be even less severe than the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics. They had been the result of an unusually very severe seasonal flu virus, but triggered nothing as draconian as what was about to be imposed by panicking public health officials in the USA.
If Dr. Fauci was of the opinion that, based on what he knew about the actual scientific consensus on the likely severity of COVID-19 in mid-February, that COVID-19 was possibly going to be just another “typical flu pandemic like 1957 or 1968”, WHY wasn’t that message being emphasized to state and local public health officials, politicians, the bourgeois press and the general public? WHY did Dr. Fauci stand by and allow panic to spread throughout the USA and then through the entire world without ever making an attempt to rein it in? The Fauci-LaPook email correspondence gives us one example of how that message was distorted even by those two (at that time) relatively level-headed men as the message was relayed to the public through the medium of one of the most “responsible” outlets of the bourgeois press in the world: CBS News.
LaPook took Fauci’s message from the 16 February email to the public relatively quickly; but it emerged from the profit-making machinery of the bourgeois press in a highly distorted form despite what appears to have been a relatively responsible and not at all COVID-19-hysterical reporter – LaPook himself.
On 1 March 2020, LaPook appeared on the CBS News show “Sunday Morning” to explain to the citizens of the USA what they “needed to know” about the Coronavirus. Click on the link below to see his report:
“The facts about coronavirus: what you need to know”; Dr. Jonathan LaPook on CBS News “Sunday Morning”
The report begins: “Coronavirus began in China several months ago, and since then, the virus — and fear of it — have been spreading around the world. There is no vaccine for coronavirus yet, but there is a treatment for fear. It’s called facts.”
He then goes on to give a pretty decent, rational and factual account of what was known about the seriousness of the COVID-19 epidemic (it was not yet a pandemic) as of March 1, 2020: “Coronavirus causes a respiratory disease called COVID-19. Symptoms include fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Most cases (about eight out of ten) are mild. The more serious cases can lead to severe lung damage.” Those facts are still true to this day. He then goes on to very lucidly describe what was known about the mortality rate of the virus:
1 March 2020; CBS News “Sunday Morning” report on Coronavirus by Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Jonathan LaPook. Though LaPook’s reportage is science-based and rational – hardly sensationalizing the epidemic – check out how the World Health Organization’s increasingly frantic statement added to the online version of LaPook’s report by a news editor completely undercuts LaPook’s rational and balanced coverage. SOURCE: CBS News website
“Just two days ago, a study from China of nearly 1,100 patients with COVID-19 reported a mortality rate of 1.4 percent; that means that of every thousand people infected, 14 will die. The death rate with flu is about 1 in a thousand.
“But some scientists feel the actual rate with coronavirus may be lower, and, in fact, closer to flu, because there are likely many cases we don’t know about, either because they are mild or the patients have no symptoms at all.” (emphasis added by IWPCHI)
Here we see that it appears that LaPook – instead of simply quoting Fauci’s statements made to him two weeks earlier which we read in the email above – attributes his information to “some scientists”. This substantially weakens the impact of his information; imagine if he (or his editors) had decided to reveal that it was Dr. Fauci who had told him “the actual [death] rate with coronavirus may be lower”! It would have been headline news! But for some reason it was completely eliminated from LaPook’s report; and in the print version online, an editor immediately followed up that reassuring information with a threatening headline statement from the World Health Organization which completely contradicts LaPook’s reporting and attempts to lure the reader AWAY from LaPook’s report towards the more sensationalist headline from the WHO! These subtle edits can make all the difference between a calming effect or the inducement of sheer panic in the minds of the citizenry!
Did LaPook inform his editors that it had been Fauci who was the source for his information that COVID-19 might not be the “deadly virus” it was being portrayed as by their competitors in the bourgeois press? If not, then it makes sense that the editors might want to keep readers on the CBS website by offering them the more exciting WHO report rather than LaPook’s more balanced (but “boringly over-factual”) reportage. For the capitalist press, profits are what matters, and if you want to draw people to your news programs from your competition you have to sensationalize everything or your less-scrupulous opponents will get those all-important ratings and advertising dollars, amirite?
However: if LaPook did inform his editors that the source for that information was Fauci, why did they decide to cut it from the report – to “bury the lede” as they say in the news business? If they had decided to make THAT the headline of the report – “Fauci: COVID-19 May Be No Worse Than 1957 or 1968 Pandemics” it would have made headlines around the world and would have thrown a major monkey wrench into the machinery of the campaign to present the impending COVID-19 pandemic as an “unprecedented” event in human history! If they deliberately chose not to run with what would have been a major world-wide scoop it is a very suspicious decision in my opinion; a crime of omission, of holding back vitally important information from the public which could very well have helped tamp down the burgeoning panic and could have prevented the draconian measures undertaken starting in March, 2020: nationwide lockdowns, mask mandates, widespread closures of “non-essential” businesses and all the rest.
Could it have been Fauci himself who refused to go “on the record” on 1 March as saying that COVID-19 had just as much chance of being a “typical flu pandemic” as anything else? If his refusal to go on record as saying what he in fact typed out in his response to LaPook, then that, too is something that needs investigation. Why would he do that in the face of the growing irrationality and hysterical reactions among members of the public throughout the USA? These are seriously bad decisions that were made by either LaPook, CBS and/or Fauci of the kind Congressional investigators might some fine day want to look into.
Beyond this most important controversy we need to pay attention to how the CBS News editors who compose their website’s written news repeatedly undercut LaPook’s intelligently-written and science-based article again and again with sensationalist headline links to other, more “exciting” panic-mongering articles designed to keep the reader in a state of confusion and fear instead of providing her with level-headed analysis of the rapidly-evolving COVID-19 story:
Source: CBS News website. Notice that most of the fear-mongering, hysterical headlines the editors keep using to undercut LaPook’s generally excellent article were published weeks ago – or even years ago during previous epidemics. (Comments in red by IWPCHI)
Source: CBS News website. Comments by IWPCHI
Source: CBS News website. (Comments in red by IWPCHI)
CBS News were of course not the only top news organizations in the world who helped stoke the fear and panic that stampeded the citizenry into accepting draconian police-state measures to “flatten the curve” for “two weeks” and which have now been flattening the world economy and leading to widespread destruction of human lives across the globe for almost two years now. Every one of CBS’s competitors were trying to outdo each other with increasingly frantic ’round-the-clock COVID-19 coverage, as we all know only too well.
From the perspective of a revolutionary socialist, these incidents illustrate the inherent weakness of the capitalist for-profit press, which makes more money the more sensationalist a story is, and in which capitalist competition between “independent” news outlets leads not to “better” “more accurate” news but to a race to the bottom for more and more lurid headlines to draw the attention of the public towards one or another news source in order to make as much money as possible. Many people criticize “communist” countries for their straight-jacketed government-run press; Socialist China was pilloried for not possessing a “free press” and for refusing to immediately publish sensationalist news reports of the “deadly virus” that emerged in Wuhan in 2019. There’s a massive amount of room for improvement in both the capitalist and the “communist” press when it comes to publishing honest non-sensationalized news reporting; the capitalist news media tends towards lurid sensationalism in their lust for profits while the so-called “communist” press of the Stalinist and Maoist types institute a deadening bureaucratic stranglehold over every word and idea published. But when it comes to coverage of vital health news coverage of emerging epidemics/pandemics like the COVID-19 pandemic that, if poorly handled, can lead to mass panic and the imposition of martial law by politicians terrified by the hysterical reactions of a citizenry driven mad by irrational fear, I know I would prefer a press that is neither crushed under the heel of ideological dogma nor profit-based; I prefer a press which is *not* involved in a life-or-death competition over advertising dollars and which is *not* compelled to compete to provide more and more sensationalized coverage in order to win the ratings wars. The bourgeois press of USA lost out to the bureaucratically-smothered state-run press of China when it came to providing the citizenry with science-based non-sensationalized news coverage of #TheGreatCoronavirusFraudOf2020 because at least Socialist China’s press was not forced to degrade itself by competing in a race to the bottom to see who could create the kind of anti-science pro-COVID-19-vaccine “news” that would win the lion’s share of hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising money from Big Pharma’s deeply corrupt and corrupting vaccine manufacturers.
—-IWPCHI